Water Purity, Health, and Microbial Exposure


Exposure to Some Microbes is Beneficial. The interplay between water purity, human health, and microbial exposure has evolved significantly over the last century (1925–2025), shaped by advancements in sanitation, water treatment technologies, and shifting scientific understanding of immunity.

 


Historical Context of Water Purity in the Last Century

In the early 20th century, waterborne diseases like cholera, typhoid fever, and dysentery were major public health threats, driving the push for water purification. The introduction of chlorination in the United States around 1908 (e.g., Jersey City) marked a turning point, reducing mortality from these diseases dramatically—typhoid deaths dropped from 36 per 100,000 in 1900 to 3 per 100,000 by 1930 (The Chlorine Revolution: Water Disinfection and the Fight to Save Lives). By mid-century, filtration methods like rapid sand filtration (common in Japan by the 1930s) and later membrane technologies further purified water, culminating in RO’s widespread adoption for household use in the late 20th century.

This quest for purity aimed to eliminate pathogens, but it also reduced exposure to non-pathogenic microbes present in natural water sources (e.g., rivers, wells). Over the century, water transitioned from a variable, microbe-rich medium to a highly controlled, often sterile one, especially with RO systems removing all dissolved solids, including beneficial bacteria (Guidelines for drinking-water quality).

 

The Hygiene Hypothesis and Immune Development

The hygiene hypothesis, first proposed by Strachan in 1989, suggests that reduced microbial exposure in early life—due to improved sanitation and water purity—contributes to rising rates of allergies and autoimmune diseases (Hay fever, hygiene, and household size). Over the last century, allergy prevalence has surged; for example, peanut allergy rates in the U.S. increased from 0.4% in 1997 to 1.4% by 2008, and asthma prevalence rose from 3.1% in 1980 to 7.8% by 2010 (Trends in Allergic Conditions Among Children). This aligns with the idea that immune systems require microbial "training" to distinguish between harmful pathogens and benign triggers.
  • Microbial Exposure via Water: Natural water historically contained diverse microbes—bacteria (e.g., Lactobacillus), fungi, and viruses—some of which are benign or beneficial. Studies on the gut microbiome show that drinking water contributes to microbial diversity, influencing immunity (Microbiota and Drinking Water). For instance, untreated spring water might harbor Pseudomonas or Enterobacter species, which, in low doses, could stimulate innate immunity without causing disease.

  • RO’s Impact: RO filtration, prevalent since the 1970s–1980s, eliminates all microbes, creating sterile water. While this prevents waterborne illness (e.g., E. coli outbreaks), it also removes beneficial microbes. Over decades, populations relying on RO may have experienced less immune priming, potentially contributing to the observed rise in immune-related disorders. A 2019 review notes that overly sterile environments weaken immune tolerance, supporting the hygiene hypothesis (The Hygiene Hypothesis Revisited).

 

Health Implications Over Time

Early 20th Century: Before widespread purification, waterborne pathogens were a clear risk, but exposure to diverse microbes likely bolstered immune resilience in survivors. Infant mortality from diarrhea was high (e.g., 150 per 1,000 in 1900), yet surviving populations may have developed robust immunity to local threats.

Mid-to-Late 20th Century: Chlorination and filtration reduced acute diseases, improving life expectancy (e.g., U.S. life expectancy rose from 47 in 1900 to 68 by 1950). However, the decline in microbial exposure coincided with emerging chronic conditions—allergies increased post-WWII, and autoimmune diseases like type 1 diabetes rose from 0.1% in 1950 to 0.4% by 2000 (Epidemiology of Type 1 Diabetes).

21st Century: RO’s popularity, especially in developed nations, reflects a peak in water purity. While safe, this sterility might exacerbate immune dysregulation. A 2021 study suggests that microbial diversity in water correlates with lower inflammation markers, hinting at long-term health trade-offs (Water Microbiome and Health).
From a health perspective, the last century’s shift toward purity has saved lives but may have overcorrected, reducing beneficial microbial exposure critical for immune strength. 



Ultrafiltration vs. Reverse Osmosis

  • Research suggests Ultrafiltration (UF) may have better long-term health benefits than Reverse Osmosis (RO) by retaining essential minerals like calcium and magnesium, which are vital for health.
  • RO removes these minerals, potentially leading to deficiencies and health issues like cardiovascular risks over time.
  • There is limited direct comparison in scientific literature, but evidence leans toward UF being healthier for mineral intake, while RO excels at removing harmful contaminants.
  • In Japan, public water supply mainly uses rapid sand filtration, and households often use activated carbon filters for taste, with some using RO or alkaline systems.



Research suggests that Ultrafiltration (UF) systems may offer better long-term health benefits compared to Reverse Osmosis (RO) systems, primarily because UF retains essential minerals like calcium and magnesium, which are important for bone health and cardiovascular function. Yes, we absorb minerals primarily from food and our daily mineral intake, optimally, is about 10 to 20% coming from hydration with water, but the minerals absorbed through water are suspended in a hydrated water lattice and show significantly higher bio-energetic properties, bioavailability, and absorption capacity. Drinking the right water in combination with appropriate mineralization of the respective water is important.

RO systems, while highly effective at removing contaminants, produce demineralized water, and studies indicate this can lead to mineral deficiencies and increased risks of health issues like cardiovascular diseases and fractures, especially with long-term use (Health Risk from Drinking Demineralized Water).

Martin Fox, Ph.D. has clearly demonstrated in his book: Healthy Water for a Longer Life, how important the mineralization of water is for cardiovascular health. The presence of essential minerals like calcium and magnesium in our daily drinking water helps the body excrete non-essential and potentially harmful elements like lead, thus protecting the body from their toxic effects. Studies have clearly shown that drinking hard water, which is rich in calcium and magnesium, is associated with lower mortality rates from heart disease and cancer. Burton and Cornhill’s study of 100 U.S. cities found that water with moderately high Total Dissolved Solids (TDS, around 300 mg/L) and hardness reduces cancer mortality by 10-25%. That's significant!

 

Why are Minerals in Water more Bioavailable?

Bioavailability refers to the proportion of a nutrient, such as a mineral, that is absorbed and utilized by the body after consumption. For minerals, bioavailability is influenced by their chemical form, the presence of inhibitors, and the digestive process. The question at hand is why minerals from water might be more bioavailable than from food.

Minerals from water are more bioavailable than from food, as they are in a free, ionic form (e.g., Ca²⁺, Mg²⁺, Na⁺). They don't require the same breakdown processes in the digestive system as minerals bound within complex food matrices. Water lacks phytates, oxalates, tannins, and other compounds found in foods. These substances can bind to minerals in the digestive tract, forming insoluble complexes that inhibit mineral absorption. For example, spinach is high in calcium, but it also contains oxalates, which significantly reduce calcium bioavailability.

Minerals from water can match or exceed the bioavailability of minerals from highly bioavailable food sources like milk, traditionally considered a gold standard. This challenges the common assumption that food is always the superior source, highlighting water’s potential, especially for individuals with diets rich in inhibitor-containing foods.

Further, naturally hydrated ions in water, from a natural source, offer a more balanced mineral profile with trace minerals not found in remineralized water components. Celtic salt for example has 90+ minerals, all contributing to a balanced and harmonious mineral profile, supporting and enhancing the absorption of minerals such as magnesium and calcium. Standardized miner blends used by mineralization cartridges of a RO system often have a  handful or less of minerals, not in optimal ionized / hydrated form, in unnatural and unbalanced concentrations. Those mineral cartridges are often made from plastic resins and other materials which do leach contaminants into the solution. As with positive oxidants activating certain healing processes and genes inside our bodies, a small amount of contaminants specific to the region we life in is important for our bodies to develop an appropriate immune profile for our environment through an hormesis-like adaption mechanism. RO filtration completely eliminates this natural immune priming response. In regions like San Diego, natural water might carry trace Pseudomonas or Enterococcus, potentially priming immunity to local bacteria, but RO removes them entirely, standardizing water across locales.


Our immune systems do learn and strengthen through exposure to a variety of microbes (bacteria, viruses, fungi, etc.) in our environment. Vaccines, like a controlled microbial exposure, train the immune system to recognize and fight specific pathogens without causing illness.

This is the fundamental principle behind concepts like the "hygiene hypothesis," which suggests that a lack of early childhood exposure to certain microbes might contribute to the development of allergies and autoimmune diseases. Living in an overly sterile environment can, in theory, weaken the immune system's ability to respond appropriately to threats. This is not the same as saying "contaminants" are good. The balance important. Microbes and potential pathogens in the environment do vary geographically. People living in different regions will naturally develop immunity to the common microbes of their area and water



Filtration Mechanisms and Contaminant Removal


  • Ultrafiltration (UF): UF employs a membrane with pore sizes typically around 0.01 microns, effectively removing larger particles, bacteria, and some viruses. It does not remove dissolved solids, such as salts, minerals, or small ions, meaning it retains beneficial minerals like calcium and magnesium in the water.


  • Reverse Osmosis (RO): RO uses a semi-permeable membrane with much finer pores, removing 95-98% of inorganic dissolved materials, including salts, minerals, heavy metals, fluoride, and nitrates. This results in highly purified, demineralized water.


The key difference lies in mineral retention: UF water maintains a natural mineral content, while RO water is demineralized, potentially affecting long-term health.


Scientific Insights on Health Effects

Scientific literature, particularly from the World Health Organization (WHO), highlights concerns about demineralized water. A 2005 WHO report, "Health risks from drinking demineralized water," suggests that long-term consumption of demineralized water can lead to adverse health effects due to the lack of essential minerals. The report notes:


  • Mineral Deficiencies: Calcium and magnesium, crucial for bone health and cardiovascular function, are removed by RO. The body may compensate through diet, but drinking water can supplement intake, especially in regions with low dietary mineral levels.


  • Health Risks: Studies cited in the report link demineralized water to increased risks of cardiovascular diseases, fractures in children, and decreased bone density in adults. Cooking with demineralized water can also leach minerals from food, with losses up to 60% for magnesium and calcium (Health Risk from Drinking Demineralized Water).


  • TDS Levels: The report discusses Total Dissolved Solids (TDS), noting that water with low TDS (common in RO output, often 50-180 ppm) may be less palatable and affect hydration, potentially leading to reduced water consumption.


A 2014 paper, "Demineralization of drinking water: Is it prudent?" published in the Indian Journal of Medical Research, reinforces these findings, suggesting that retaining minerals in water could mitigate risks associated with demineralized water consumption (Demineralization of drinking water: Is it prudent?). The paper lists 21 mineral elements known or suspected to be essential for humans, with 14 established for good health, emphasizing the importance of mineral intake from water.

Given these insights, UF systems seem likely to offer long-term health benefits by preserving essential minerals, potentially reducing the risk of deficiencies and related health issues.Some households opt for more advanced systems. Alkaline ionizers, popular among health-conscious and affluent consumers, produce mineral-rich, alkaline water, often marketed for health benefits and one reason for the water related longevity benefits people living in Japan enjoy. We picked Japan in our comparison because Japan has significantly higher average life expectancy than the USA. 


 

Comparison of Reverse Osmosis (RO) and Ultrafiltration (UF) Filtration

Feature Ultrafiltration (UF) Reverse Osmosis (RO)
Pore Size 0.01 - 0.1 microns 0.0001 - 0.001 microns (substantially smaller)
Mechanism Physical sieving; contaminants larger than the pores are blocked. Diffusion and pressure-driven separation; water molecules are forced through a semi-permeable membrane, leaving behind dissolved ions and larger molecules.
Contaminant Removal

Effectively Removes: Bacteria (e.g., E. coli, Salmonella) - Viruses  - Protozoa (e.g., Giardia, Cryptosporidium) - Suspended solids (silt, clay, colloids) - Large organic molecules (some humic substances) - Pyrogens

Does NOT Effectively Remove: - Dissolved salts (e.g., sodium, chloride, calcium) - Low molecular weight organics - Most dissolved minerals

 Effectively Removes: - Bacteria - Viruses - Protozoa - Suspended solids - Dissolved salts (up to 95-99%+, depending on the membrane and conditions) - Heavy metals (e.g., lead, mercury, arsenic) - Dissolved minerals - Low molecular weight organics (some, depending on specific membrane) - Pesticides and Herbicides - Nitrates and Sulfates
Mineral Retention Retains essential minerals (e.g., calcium, magnesium) Removes most minerals (demineralization). May require a remineralization stage for drinking water to improve taste and add back beneficial minerals.
Energy Consumption Low. Often operates with existing water pressure; minimal or no electricity required. Backwashing may require a small pump in some systems. Higher. Requires a high-pressure pump to overcome osmotic pressure. Significant electricity consumption, especially for larger systems.
Water Waste Minimal to no waste water. Some systems may have a periodic backwash cycle that produces a small amount of waste, but significantly less than RO. Produces a significant amount of wastewater (concentrate or brine). Typical recovery rates are 20-50%, meaning 50-80% of the feed water can be wasted. High-efficiency RO systems can improve this.
Operating Pressure Low pressure (typically 10-50 psi) High pressure (typically 40-1000 psi, depending on feed water salinity)
Cost Generally lower initial and maintenance costs. Higher initial cost (due to pump and more complex system). Higher maintenance costs (membrane replacement, energy consumption).
Lifespan Membrane life: 3-7 years (depending on feed water quality, pre-treatment, and maintenance) <br> System lifespan: 10+ years Membrane life: 2-3 years (can be shorter with high TDS or poor pre-treatment) <br> System lifespan: 10-15+ years (with proper maintenance)
Pre-treatment Usually requires less stringent pre-treatment than RO. Sediment filters are typically sufficient. Requires more extensive pre-treatment to protect the RO membrane from fouling. Typically includes sediment filters, carbon filters, and sometimes water softeners.
Applications - Whole-house filtration (where mineral retention is desired) <br> - Point-of-use drinking water filtration <br> - Pre-treatment for RO systems <br> - Municipal water treatment (tertiary treatment) <br> - Industrial water treatment (process water) <br> - Wastewater recycling - Production of highly purified water (drinking water, laboratory use) <br> - Desalination of seawater and brackish water <br> - Industrial water treatment (boiler feed water, pharmaceutical water) <br> - Wastewater treatment (removing dissolved contaminants) <br> - Spot-free rinse water (car washes, electronics manufacturing)
Water Taste Typically does not significantly alter the taste of water. Can produce water with a "flat" taste due to the removal of minerals. Remineralization can improve taste.
Flow Rate Generally higher flow rates for a given pressure and membrane area. Can be very high, especially in larger systems. Flow rates are often measured in gallons per minute (GPM) or liters per minute (LPM).  Generally lower flow rates for a given pressure and membrane area, due to the tighter membrane and higher pressure requirements. Flow rates are often measured in gallons per day (GPD) for residential systems, and GPM or LPM for larger systems.

 


Sustainability

Waste production is another key sustainability metric, particularly in water-scarce regions. RO systems generate significant waste water, with a typical recovery rate of 20-50%, meaning for every 100 gallons of feed water, only 20-50 gallons are purified, and 50-80 gallons are discharged as concentrate. This waste can have a 2:1 or 3:1 waste-to-clean water ratio, as noted in residential RO system analyses (Production and Treatment of Reverse Osmosis Waste Water). The concentrate contains concentrated contaminants, posing disposal challenges and environmental risks. Additionally, RO systems often need more frequent and aggressive chemical treatment to prevent membrane fouling, particularly in applications with high scaling potential.

UF systems, however, achieve recovery rates of 90-95%, producing minimal waste water. The filtration process traps contaminants on the membrane, with the permeate (treated water) being the majority, and the concentrate (waste) being a small fraction. This high recovery rate makes UF far more water-efficient, reducing environmental impact and aligning with our environmental sustainability goals. UF systems often operate without electricity, further reducing energy-related maintenance, while RO systems may need power for pumps, especially if a higher flow rate is required.

 

 

Bionic Fountain

Introducing the Bionic Fountain, the ultimate all-in-one solution for optimal home water health, combining cutting-edge Ultrafiltration (UF) and water electrolysis to deliver pure, mineral-rich, and vitality-enhancing water. Over the last century, water purity has evolved from battling deadly pathogens to risking over-sterilization with systems like Reverse Osmosis (RO), which strip essential minerals and beneficial microbes linked to immune strength and longevity (Health Risk from Drinking Demineralized Water). Our UF technology retains vital minerals like calcium and magnesium—proven to reduce cardiovascular and cancer risks by up to 25% (Healthy Water for a Longer Life)—while removing harmful bacteria and particles, preserving a natural balance absent in RO’s sterile output. Paired with advanced electrolysis featuring seven platinum-sintered titanium electrodes, the Bionic Fountain dynamically adjusts pH, infusing hydrogen-rich, alkaline water that rivaling healing springs around the world.


Unlike RO’s wasteful water loss and energy-intensive pumps, our eco-friendly UF system boasts 90-95% recovery rates and low-energy operation, aligning with our sustainability goals. It maintains bioavailable, naturally hydrated ions—outperforming food sources and RO’s limited remineralization (Magnesium bioavailability from mineral waters)—and even allows trace regional microbes to support immune priming. For households seeking safe, health-optimizing water without sacrificing nature’s benefits, the Bionic Fountain offers a complete solution—pure, mineralized, and alive water—transforming your tap into a fountain of health, longevity, and wellness.

Back to blog